Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak reacts to Apple’s long-awaited new artificial intelligence features announced at the company’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference. Speaking to Alix Steel and Romaine Bostick on “Bloomberg Markets: The Close,” Wozniak says he’s very interested in “Apple Intelligence.” You have questions about AI. We have answers. Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology’s weekly Q&A newsletter: ——– More on Bloomberg TV and Markets Like this video? Subscribe and turn on notifications so you don’t miss any videos from Bloomberg Markets & Finance: Visit for business news and analysis, up-to-the-minute market data, features, profiles and more. Connect with Bloomberg Television at: X: Facebook: Instagram: Connect with Bloomberg Business…

By admin

50 thoughts on “Steve Wozniak Reacts to Apple’s New AI Tools”
  1. I love Steve Wozniak, the way he is both skeptical and candid about features and the Apple strategy. When he said he wasn't impressed, this should be both read as "i know Apple can do this" and "i'm not getting impressed with the tech hype", he blames the company for the worst practices and praise it for the best at the same time. That's what makes him such an amazing guy to listen to.

  2. What has Tim Cook managed Apple done to fight cancer? Steve Jobs died from pancreatic cancer. Solve the cancer problem rather than trying to make a car no one will buy… 🙄

  3. I have noticed that ChatGPT seems to present a biased narrative. When I asked it to list 10 racist comments by Trump, it provided comments that were proven to be false, inaccurately quoted, or other such instances. However, when I asked it to list 10 racist comments by Biden, it claimed it couldn't find any results, which seems strange to me because I found 10 such comments with a single Google search. Moreover, I've been following Biden since his plagiarism scandal and find it odd that no comments were listed. It seems like there might be someone controlling the results with a specific narrative or agenda.

  4. Woz is honest with his thoughts which is dangerous for the marketing and sales team. Customers may not like his thoughts, company may fail to progress. That's why Apple needed both Steves. One is best at making things, the other is best for presenting things.

  5. No, Apple's new AI is not an example of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Current AI technologies, including those developed by Apple, are still within the realm of Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI). Here are a few points to elaborate on this:

    Understanding AI Categories:
    Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI):

    Scope: ANI is designed for specific tasks. Examples include language processing, image recognition, and recommendation systems.
    Capabilities: ANI systems can outperform humans in their specific domains but cannot generalize knowledge or skills across different areas.
    Examples: Siri, Apple's virtual assistant, and other machine learning models used in Apple's products are examples of ANI.
    Artificial General Intelligence (AGI):

    Scope: AGI would have the ability to understand, learn, and apply knowledge across a wide range of tasks, similar to human cognitive abilities.
    Capabilities: AGI would be able to generalize knowledge, perform any intellectual task that a human can do, and adapt to new situations autonomously.
    Status: AGI remains a theoretical concept and has not been achieved by any technology or company.
    Apple's AI Technologies:
    Siri and Machine Learning:

    Siri uses machine learning and natural language processing to understand and respond to user queries. It operates within the constraints of ANI, performing specific tasks such as setting reminders, sending messages, and providing weather updates.
    Apple integrates various machine learning models into its products for tasks like facial recognition, photography enhancements, and personalized recommendations. These models are highly specialized and do not possess general intelligence.
    Core ML and Neural Engine:

    Apple's Core ML framework allows developers to integrate machine learning models into apps, leveraging the Neural Engine for efficient processing. These capabilities enhance specific functionalities within apps but do not equate to general intelligence.
    Conclusion:
    While Apple continues to innovate and enhance its AI technologies, these advancements remain within the scope of ANI. AGI, which would require a system to possess human-like cognitive abilities and adaptability, is still a goal for the distant future and has not been realized by Apple or any other company.

  6. Woz is a true OG. Its too bad that real engineers like him aren't running these companies. Instead its greedy marketing people (puke) pushing outdated trash to know nothing consumers who obsess over labels.

  7. So instead of spending money on development of new products that aren't reheated Samsung components from years past, Apple spent $110 BILLION on stock buybacks to artificially inflate stock prices. Apple makes profits. Not phones.

  8. apple is dying on the vine with overpriced marketing exercises and very little actual engineering. White paint and glass storefronts do not make the phones or computers any better and stock buybacks put on full display the disingenuous nature of that company.

  9. The last sentence was the reason for me buying Apple products in past. Currently it‘s just copying something on one device and pasting it to another. I‘m looking forward to getting more reasons in future. 🤩

  10. I have both Apple and android products. The android product seems to be a little better and by android I mean Google as far as speech recognition goes. Expendable storage you know the fact that they’re half of the price it’s already built in AI. With Gemini or call assistant.

  11. Big media and big government are just trying to scare people into giving up their liberty for some future safety.

    Government should not regulate computer programming (AI). Let the Industry or market place regulate AI, but don’t regulate it by laws. Congress has no constitutional authority to regulate computer programming (AI). That does not mean they won’t do it. It will end results into a disaster. Keep Programming Free from Government Interference.
    Government will regulate it is the biggest danger of AI. Unenforceable except for Copyrights and liability and slander and defamation. States can't regulate computer programing.

  12. He is by far one of the most genuine people in business and tech I’ve witnessed. I’ve appreciated his honesty for years. He should be a bigger part of Apple or still be a part of Apple. The company would be better with him in it.

  13. AI models are becoming like Search Engines, with ChatGPT being the modern Google with many people using it in their products and services.

    If Apple wants to capture the market, they should start developing their own AI and implement, as AI is in the early stages, before it gets to expensive for Apple to catch up.
    Like making a competitive search engine for Google, it’s to expensive to make a Search Engine as good as Google.

    These days AI coming to smartphones is like smartphones having access the internet (like Safari) from the very first iPhone.

    So lets see what the future holds for us!

  14. It can definitely have a better life, with the possibility of educating people and raising new generations with education, respect and honor in people's choices, and a perfect mechanism to have a healthy and healthy future life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *