MORGOV PARTNERS: My Books: Blogger: WordPress: Where to find me: Substack: Youtube: Bitchute: Rumble: Odysee: Minds: Twitter: Gab: Gettr: BTC: 17q1BfF2up8orEKN8DQgpEPX83RfbAZ5QL ETH: 0x956e7aF6706C3b5E2cf7e15c16c7018c 4f42aF79 LTC : LQNJed6vDhR4U4LB7g8jGep4UQ7yeqJdPw Dogecoin: DNYSanJEY8fbxUzwjTJWA3d1Sna9hra4NJ BCH: qz2wtp2w8grldn7gw5guqc42zxsgwuen8qxk49mhv9 SHIB : 0x956e7aF6706C3b5E2cf7e15c16c7018c4f42aF79 #NYC #AI
New Yorks laws are so onerous even the friggin Chatbot is breaking the law 🤣
That advice would be in line with some Chinese restaurants. I have an urge to don a tin foil hat.
AI meets Soros empire, it's gonna be hilarious.
3:17 Make sure you record the interaction with the A.I chat bot so they can't say you fall suffide anything
Sounds like New York is about to raise taxes in order to pay it's legal fees 😂
No doubt ai driving cars right around the corner
Sue the city for false free legal advice.
AI is a plan for governments to. Be lazier and less accountable
New York has a brand and that brand is utter schittq and incompetence
Time to move out of NYC
Guaran-DAMN-teed that the chat bot was faster and at least 50% more reliable in its answers.
Because humans, that work for the city, in NYC, are probably some of the least productive and reliable workers in the UNIVERSE.
Especially if they are black and entitled.
If a government official urges you to break a law, that's entrapment. Sounds like a precedent setting case will be coming.
No it's just the AI doesn't know the difference between a law abiding citizen and a criminal. It knows the laws only apply to certain people in New York, and in this case plenty of homeless and illegals are allowed to throw trash wherever they want with impunity. And no, the cops won't investigate anyone's case if the bot told them the wrong thing. They'll cite the person with a fine and say "tell it to the judge", and the "judge" will laugh the case out of "court" and say the person is responsible. Now get out of here because the "judge" has some violent criminals to release without bail. As far as the government's bot, they'll just put some disclaimer at the bottom that says the bot is not a reliable source of legal advice and it is the responsibility of the user to verify anything it says.
Have you heard about the woman who got a speeding ticket while her van was on a tow truck??
What would you expect from NYC, once the big Apple to a third world shithole.
If you think New York won't still find you guilty for relying on THEIR advice then you don't know New York.
Cute to see you pretending government trys to do it for us and fails.. 😂
Reality on the ground is that government is sold out and hasn't done anything for us in a long time.
This is on purpose to raise more revenue. Live in the now man..
Imagine living somewhere where you can't throw garbage bags in the dumpster.
AI…so NOT INTELLIGENT.
are you a jew?
Business Owner: NYCbot, am I legally allowed to get rid of an employee that does not do the work?
NYCbot: Only if you dispose of them.
Business Owner: Well the bot says so. shrugs
Imagine that, a corrupt govt has a corrupt AI.
Leave it to government to cause more problems than it solves. Imagine a government outright telling its citizens to break laws. Responsible AI is an oxymoron
I wonder if the AI is going 'This NYC law make no sense, F it'
Lol Styx. What do you think the success rate of a NYC employee answering legal questions is gonna be? I’ll take the chatbot side of that bet all day long!
This is a terrible idea because chat bots are prone to making things up to avoid saying no
Watch Louis Rossmann videos. New York City is a business Hellscape!!!
Air Canada had to pay $1000 because their chatbot told them the wrong thing.
It’s just a little nibble 😂
Grand Moff Engoron! 😂 Have you ever followed Louis Rossman's travails as an NYC business owner on YouTube? Spoiler, he moved his business to Texas.
Cops arrest based on muh fe-fe’s so if they THINK it’s illegal, they will arrest and let the judge figure it out
They put a disclaimer on it, so using it is not a legal defense because it has a fine print warning that it might not be accurate.
I can’t imagine anyone knowing the entire encyclopedias, of Laws & Regulations.
Much Less competently setting up an AI repository, of them all.
Given how Louis Rossman recorded his trials and tribulations with the actual NYC personnel, this is not surprising. 😂😮😢
Note: It advised that the rat-nibbled cheese is good to serve as long as you think it's good and you tell the customer.
Also note: What is the chatbot advice when the customer refuses the rat-nibbled cheese which you assured them is ok?
Heinz ketchup?
I now know what stupid is as stupid does means.