How Not to Be Replaced by AGI Keep Up with the AI Job Market – AI Tutorials – 🐤 Follow me on Twitter 🌐 Checkout My website – Links from today’s video: Links from today’s…
Meta STRIKES AGAIN! New AI DEVICE, Microsofts NEW Model PHI-3, Adobe Firefly 3 STUNS! And More
By
admin
No one with those kind of glasses or other devices will ever be allowed to enter my home.
The glasses look just like classic Wayfarers that the underrated Yardbirds singer Keith Relf, wore while performing the 1965 hit, Heart Full of Soul on the Shindig TV show 59 years ago.
If they don’t gave my meta AI on my app I don’t want it
Awesome. Thank you.
Where is ICC for the Zuckerberg?
Won’t llama be open source? Re – the point of AI models being opensource could result in a catastrophy…
Darn.. I thought i had a dead pixel but realised it was your mouse!
omg, a device that basicly does the same as my phone just without the ai.. Maybe just add the ai to your phone?
Omg we dont even have AI capable of driving a friken car without killing how many now? Dont blame the AI, blame the idiot who released it, blame the govt which allowed it, blame the lack of hardware the data needs but DO NOT blame the AI. Its like blaming your shoe for driving fast.
open source versus nuke threatening, hyper firewalling paranoid autocrats putin/Xi with covertly trained non open source super intelligent AGI – which is more likely to prevent an illiberal dystopian outcome ?
19:00 you need the equipment to do it, you cant buy it freely, the show breaking bad is a good example. Also you need a lot of money. Assume AI is like having 10 scientists? There are already bad actors, like Iran, with money and scientists and they can't do shit. Don't fall for this jailing narrative. Intelligence = freedom, average joe can't be free
19:07 By that point, it will already be too late, the knowledge of how to get there will already be public, they might delay things a bit by not allowing access to their models, but it will be such a small incremental step from what's already out there by then, that a bad actor will be able to piece together something equivalent. We are already in too deep with too many people not being worried enough; if anything, open-sourcing such a powerful model increases the odds people will notice issues sooner and maybe be capable of using even the model itself to create preemptive defenses before some malicious actor unleashes an attack stealthy. Can you imagine the disaster if for example Elon goes on one of his benders and says something stupid to the secret X AI, or Mark "they trust me, dumb fucks" Zuckerberg decides it's finally time to free up space for the lizard-people occupation of planet Earth, or Xinnie the Poo realizes he doesn't need to "save face" if only his mindless slaves are immune to the next ultra-fatal pandemic, and so on? It's an arms race now; open-sourcing at least increases the number of players in the game and hopefully, there's enough good guys that one of them will get to the finish line before the bad guys get too big of a headstart.
Ok let's just trust the rich and powerful to be the only ones with access to super powerful AI. Nothing terrible could possibly come from widening the power gap.
Capitalism is the true evil. Greed for power will always trump any fear of malicious or bad actors committing wrong-doing. If such a technology cannot be open sourced, a handful of people will control all of earth which is beyond evil and wrong. Dystopia is here , look around you carefully as we progress through the late-stage and final stages of capitalism.
04:37 Bad logic, magicians do it all the time; and other companies have been caught faking "live" demos.
I'll be honest, as soon as I hear the name Gary Marcus, I skip the part. I am aware of safety issues, but mostly it shows me how difficult our society is. If human beings would be 'better' themselves, there wouldn't be much danger at all. But this guy… no… I can't listen to him. It is impossible for me. Unfortunately he was in some podcasts with other people and he was just plainly dumb… I don't like to insult people, but he was changing whatever he said the whole time until the point as he became contradictory to his own things… it was horrible. I wanted to give him a chance, but he proved it was just a waste of time…
You use covid as an example of a bad thing that could happen with a rogue agent, completely disregarding that it was bio-engineered by a select few and completely covered up by people in power.
Ai jobloss is the only thing I worry about anymore. Not spy shades.
Recognizing a spreadsheet from a photo and manipulating it is nothing new or unique. You can do it today with your phone. I don't understand the Rabbit hype. It's a joke.
Great Videos & content.. though your introductions are a bit “hyperbolic”… I have to take a Xanax after watching your video’s 🤣🤪 ….god knows what’ll happen to your blood pressure when AGI is confirmed 😊…. But keep the good work up…
Hey Zuck, how can we gather even more data covertly to train our future robots?
Zuck: Glasses!
I haven’t even got the updates yet as I’m the uk but they are awesome specially with all the AI updates coming hopefully to the UK as well
I suggest you check out The Thought Emporium, he cured himself of lactose intolerance with a custom engineered gene therapy that he created. Of course exactly the same thing could be done to do bad things, you don't need an LLM for that..
I cant believe hes turning anti open source bruh. Yeah letting corpos and governments hold the God power is a wonderful idea
What is wrong with people? The one thing that Covid taught us is that the so-called overseers lie and they abuse crisis. So you don’t think that will happen with AI?😂😂😂😂
The best part of this interview is where you said it could teach people to go to Walmart and build a bio weapon! You obviously haven’t been in Walmart lately! 😂. “attention, Walmart, shoppers !Rollback on bio precursors in isle 4”😂😂
As far as the infinite data generation that would only apply to close systems where the rules are known in the boundaries are defined
As far as using it for code, you just use very specific things like certain functions or like say loops where you can kinda overlook the code to make sure it’s not weird as far as reliability goes the critics right I watch test on llama three and it would get the same question wrong one out of three times it has to be 100% imagine AI flying in airplane where there’s 1 million flights but it gets it wrong one percent of the time, that would be 1000 crashes. But it’s in the early innings.
The Vision looks kinda Mid
META / FACEBOOK SAME DAMN 👎🏻👎🏻
The gain of function lab was closed sourced. Open source everything what if a malicious actor created this dangerous ai and no one knew the source code they would be a step behind trying to stop the malicious act.
Governments with AI are more scary than the average person.
Vis a vis Phi: Inference cost will be the key to broad deployment of AI. The big news with some of the new LLMs is that “overtraining” can make quite small models perform as well as large ones. Investing more up front in training will pay huge dividends in lowering inference cost.
We’ve seen Mixture of Experts (MOE) as a common strategy for improved accuracy vs total parameters, I wonder if we’ll see systems where low-parameter “production-“ or edge models will know when they need to call in the big guns of the massive models to answer complex prompts. At least 50-60% of what I ask it doesn’t need the full capability of ChatGPT; for the average user it’s probably more like 90%. (I tend to ask a lot of deeper or more complex questions than I suspect is typical.)
This will be even more the case for many useful agentic workflows. The understanding or knowledge required for things like screening email, creating and running basic spreadsheets or processing simple workflows like processing an invoice is very low compared to the breadth and depth of current mainstream LLMs. For instance, I think the amount of intelligence needed to run Open Interpreter for many apps is actually quite low, meaning it could probably run on a very small model.
I can imagine a future where, say highly-1B or even 100M parameter models could run on local devices, only handing off 5 or 10% of the harder work to the cloud.
It’s gonna turn out that Mike judges Idiocracy the movie is gonna be reality as people rely too much on this technology is acrutch. I’m for the tech it just people rely on it too much.
dude please with 30 minute videos add time stamps…. i aint watching this just to see 1 thing
@19:00 it took primitive tools and a suicide to take down twin towers- if ppl want to destroy the planet, AI access won’t make a difference. My sister was a chem bio nuc warfare specialist in the army and I read some of the declassified manuals years ago, there is plenty of material out there for any nit wit to do things like this, AI just makes it less tricky but it doesn’t matter if someone has the will
More CRAP we don't need AND didn't ask for. Tech has gone way too far and will only get worse.
[;ease add time stamps to your videos
@9:23 that seems ridiculously over engineered when you can just put that into the prompt completion in the right order with adequate prompt engineering
They had AI in them. I use my buddies in December 2023. I guess I just updated it
Tell me ROB ME without telling me to rob you of your meta glasses lol 🤣
Keep those things away from me. Never trust meta.
I believe two things:
1) The future is going to be unimaginably wonderful
2) We're going to spend a lot of time in absolute hell to get there first – bioweapons, malware, the civil unrest from a meaning and jobs crisis. Do not live anywhere near a city if you can help it.
I'm buying land in the middle of nowhere and I intend to live there for at least 10 years.
Google did it before it was cool!
The thing that is weird about meta glasses is that they are made by meta, a company that’s so intrusive to your data that I would never want to share with them my whole life through video fed glasses
This so fascinating. I want Ai to teach me The Ari. Ai what does this mean.
The Ari uncovered extraordinary secrets inside the Zohar's poetic words. He described a system of evolution that went far beyond what Darwin would explain centuries later, writing:
Against this: A minimal living system may be viewed as “a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution”. It has been proposed that autocatalytic sets of chemical reactions (ACSs) could serve as a mechanism to establish chemical compositional identity, heritable self-reproduction, and evolution in a minimal chemical system.