Exploring the latest in AI technology really feels like a step into the future. With instruments like the Claude 3 OPUS and GPT-4 on the scene, writing and research reach a whole new level. When we dive into writing with Claude AI, it’s clear that it’s not just about writing documents faster. It’s about how these tools can think with us, offering insights and support that push our projects beyond what we ever imagined. ▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving free tools and academic advice directly from me: ▶ Become a master academic writer with AI using my course: ▶ Use my Ultimate PhD Kickstart: 12-Point System for success for aspiring PhD students to get your PhD off to a strong start: ▶ My best YouTube advice curated into an easy-to-follow course, Effortless Academia:…
Claude 3.5 Sonet
I love Claude opus. I prefer it for my legal work over chatgpt
I'd absolutely love to have you as my lit review supervisor!
I'm doing my first undergrad lit review on human factors in maternity care and haven't got a scooby where to start, we keep getting conflicting and confusing advice. Our supervision has been a major let-down regarding quality at my uni. We only get to submit two pieces of 500 words for assessment. I understand they have many other students to look at, but how it's set up/organised will inevitably let the students down. I think either AI programs or the links you've kindly provided are justified in this instance, but I will try chatGPT, so thank you for your review! 🙂
You've good teeth. Is it veneers?
Can you provide the link to your dentist?
Any AI that creates research model?
Difference in buying ChatGPT 4 vs AI free tools.
There used to be a way cheaper and arguably better tool called Noteable that worked inside of regular Jupyter notebooks. You could easily make edits to the code yourself and re-run anything you wanted and it could even integrate with ChatGPT as a plugin. Unfortunately, they shut down earlier this year and there isn't a proper alternative :/
I conducted a couple of different searches and provided several fake papers.
What a shit you are spitting out. Claude ain’t even available in half of the countries. Don’t make yourself junck youtuber by advertising for some cheap apps.
I was so excited about Claude for scientific research but yesterday was beyond dissappointed when I realized it totally fabricated several phony studied in GREAT DETAIL!! When i discovered this and confronted it, it apologized. I was very upset because I took it seriously.
Thank you for the very informative content. It would be great if your time allows to explaisn the following two queries:
– When the following terms are synonyms and when are they distinct?
1) Purpose, aim
2) Objective, goals, scope,
3) Justification, motivation, importance
4) Problem statement, gap, rationale, hypothesis
5) Problem, issue, challenge, obstacle,
6) Drawback, pitfall, drawbacks, shortcomings, disadvantages, cons, limitations, weaknesses,
7) Contribution, significance, novelty, originality, innovation
8) Theoretical framework, conceptual framework, study framework, study flowchart, etc.
9) Thesisdissertation
10) Preface, background, overview, context, executive summary,
11) Conclusion, summary, etc.
– What is the most common sequence of sections in the the dissertationthesis structure in the introduction chapter?
1) Overview (contextprefaceetc.)
2) Problem statement
3) Aim
4) Objective
5) Questions
6) Scope
7) Contribution
8) Thesis structure
Are you comparing with the 4 version of ChatGPT?
I asked Claude to recommend sources and provide citations too, but it did hallucinate. It gave me the names of real authors of similar papers, but with made up titles and dates.
Thank you 🙏 Andy for this wonderful content. Can you also make a comparison video of Gemini Advanced with chatGPT-4 for Research Context
Leónidas from 300 would be jealous of that beard. Majestic.
Why are you shouting at us?
I’ve been using Claude since last year, it’s amazing what they’ve managed to accomplish in this short amount of time.
You're papers are too complicated, lol
By the way i am talking about claude opus it is dope
It absolutely is for qualitative. I created a structure prompt system for theme coding of transcripts. I also created a method for cross checking with snap assessments from humans and theme consistency with chat gpt
Claude is still responding with fictitious sources/references!
Dear sir, you are my hero!
Andy, thank you for keeping me up with AI technologies.
How can I upload files in Chatgpt??
Wow, the comparison between Claude and chat GPT is so thorough! It's fascinating to see the strengths and weaknesses of each platform for research purposes.
Hahaha 😂 heary ear 👂🤣
Please do a video about Meta-Analysis and KI. Thank you.
Honestly kinda funny how well its memorized certain papers – sometimes can even reproduce the DOI, WITHOUT internet access
Great tutorial as usual and Game Over ChatGPT ???
Even free version of Claude is now my favourite tool now, it is better than Gemini too.
The answers it gives sounds more natural and human.
Hi, that issue can be resolved by giving the affected papers a shorter name. It will work. Then try to remove any special characters.
5:43 😂
1:35 😂 crazy!
I have found Claude to be much better at chatting with pdfs. Though it does not have access to the web.
How to bypass plagairism?? Please need of it
Unfortunately not available for many countries
Andy, you are simply awesome!
Also, in what AI universe is Andy in that have chatgpt allowing the upload of images and documents? Is he comparing the paid versions or the free ones? Also, most of these tools allow you to reprompt them to give more detailed answers or to retry a different style of answering. Maybe he should have a disclaimer that the comparison he performs are based on the first/initial prompts. Because he uses an entertaining format of presentation, such nuance could be lost to audience with 3 min attention span.
Hi Andy, Just wanted to give you a solution to get rid of pop up massage after uploading a pdf. It is all about the name of the pdf. If it consists of " -, _, " this massage will show up if you change it to a simple name it will be fixed. 🙂
It works best when subscribed. Worth the money so far.
PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED.
I use Claude 3 Sonnet since its inception way beyond chat gpt yet you always need to know what would be expected as an output, second you need to include validation and verification steps in the prompts, and, lastly use other AIs to improve your prompts. Chatgpt is history. Now more important is integration with other tools.
Chatgpt and it's plugin ❤
Game over
Tried to use it but it was impossible for me to use it as the registration process didn't work. It sent me a code on my phone but the code never worked.
Other disadvantages of Claude compared to chatGPT:
– the message limit: you'll hit very frequently. And it will ask you to wait for 5 hours (!) to ask again
– the chat is really basic: you can't cancel an ongoing text generation, you can't quote part of its answer, LaTeX NOT SUPPORTED !!! etc…
I have been using both AI platform. Personally, I prefer Claude than chat gpt for research purposes. Number of reasons but few things that I like it in most, summarization and the quality of written work. There is no over praising word on Claude for rephrasing sentences. Also better understanding whole document rather than gpt. Anyway I am satisfied with Claude.