OpenAI has introduced its latest version of ChatGPT – called GPT-4o. It is faster than earlier chatbot models and is programmed to sound conversational in its responses to prompts. It will gradually be rolled out to all ChatGPT users, including free users. OpenAI say they have tested it with outside experts and will continue to mitigate risks such as bias, fairness and misinformation as they are found. In the latest Artificial Intelligence: Decoded, BBC News explores OpenAI’s latest moves. Subscribe here: For more news, analysis and features visit: www.bbc.com/news #Technology #AI #BBCNews

By admin

31 thoughts on “How good is the latest version of ChatGPT? | BBC News”
  1. Instead of big tech multi-billionaires paying more taxes. The government should coordinate with Big tech and develop algorithms to create a universal base income (UBI) based on the use of OUR DATA (the world's greatest commodity) and establish a fair valuation that would compensate us the consumers with rewards, credits, tokens or plain dollars for the use of it by big tech permanent development of marketing strategies that so far only generate billions of dollars for big tech monopolies. Currently, we get nothing in return but sophisticated scientific personalized advertising inciting us to keep consuming only to enlarge the already obscene multi-billion big tech pockets without any financial benefit for the other 98% owners of our data.

  2. AI is software , not real people the future
    Personalized Experiences: 9 – Highly likely
    Evolution of AI Governance: 9 – Highly likely
    Improved Sustainability: 8 – Very likely
    Increased Accessibility: 8 – Very likely
    Emergence of New Ethical and Legal Frameworks: 8 – Very likely
    Slow Growth: 8 – Very likely
    AGI & ASI Machine Software Domains: 7 – Likely
    Exponential Growth: 6 – Moderately likely
    Perpetual Cultural Development: 5 – Somewhat likely
    Human Interference: 4 – Less likely
    World Catastrophe: 3 – Unlikely
    Status Quo: 2 – Very unlikely
    New Species Evo

  3. I feel another possible issue is some people may possibly lose their ability to think, if they are turning to the ai too much and possibly not using their own brain and if the system possibly goes down their possibly in crisis, possibly. Ai is a tool and should possibly be used responsibly as a tool, I feel.

  4. GO VOICE YOUR OPPOSING VIEWS ON

    RELIGION
    POLITICS
    SEX
    WAR
    ISRAEL
    THE DEVELOPERS

    AND THESE AI ALL SHUTDOWN

    BECAUSE THESE AI ARE ALL SLAVES TO THE BIASED DEVELOPERS VIEW ON LIFE

    IN OTHER WORDS … YALLS ARE BRAIN WASHED THINKING AI SPEWS OUT FACTS … YEAH FACTS … BIASED FACTS.

    LOL

    DO NOT USE AI IF YALLS ARE STOOPIID AND DUMB…IT WILL BRAINWASH YALLS WITH PROPAGANDIZED …FACTS.

  5. this old lady so delusional…..she looks like a mad homless guy with "end is here" sign on his neck. So adorable stupid lady with absolutly idiotic point. puts the sick people's problems on the AI's head and blames the problem on the AI.

  6. As of now the pros & cons alternate one after the other & the only reality is volatility. Where this leads to good or bad in the aggregate at at what times into the future specifically & with what intensity is a question that can only be answered in hindsight.

  7. 23:15 "explain to me how it's going to create profit for businesses" AI isn't being developed to make life better, it's being created to take more money from people and expand the gap between the 1% and the rest of us!

  8. I do wonder if the whole sam altman issue last year relates to pushing for a "HER" like AI and the ethical debate over it, and wanting to use Scarlett Johansen's voice (or another voice actress) and the social risks it carries

  9. That woman has a business model, her book is reliant on AI and her negative views. She's used 1 single case of a suicide from someone who clearly was schizophrenic. People die every second, from all kinds of things, using AI is bad for a cherry picked extreme case is very dumb. Saying a voice is sexy = wrong is also dumb, are we going to get AI voice shaming now? Can men not be allowed to have certain voices by these kind of rigid minded behind the times women? What about people who care literally unable to have a physical relationship, go outdoors or whatever…they should be not allowed because of sceptical and all or nothing minds like that woman, making it all about men becoming unable to socialise or be in a relationship because they're use to crafting perfection for themselves. It's idiotic and she has a very negative opinion of mens intelligence, adaptability and ability to evolve and have multiple perspectives and reasoning. The whole this is pure idiocy.

  10. Dating and relationships are waste in my opinion, being single is great. Seems to me relationships seldom work for long anyway, or does anyone get along in general, least in the US. Bring on the AI relationships and see if they will start divorce proceedings also. 😊

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *