Google Gemini merges with AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry. #ainews #ai #agi #singularity #google Thanks to our sponsor Vidu: Join their Discord: Join their Artist Plan: The Google Blog: Newsletter: Find AI tools and jobs: Support: Here’s my gear, in case you’re wondering: Dell Precision 5690: GPU: Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada Mouse/Keyboard: ALOGIC Echelon Microphone: Shure SM7B Audio Interface: Scarlett Solo 0:00 Really Smart AI 1:12 Ranking AI Models 2:39 Google Now …

By admin

44 thoughts on “Google’s new AI crushes all. True intelligence is here!”
  1. You have to talk about ‘The Terminator’ if you’re talking about artificial intelligence. I actually think that that’s way off. I don’t think that an artificially intelligent system that has superhuman intelligence will be violent. I do think that it will disrupt our culture.

  2. Last time I tried it, it didn't know who Gemini was itself… kept suggesting another company using that rather common name as the place to get the Gemini app. I guess I will have to try it again. [Edit – I just did, and asked it whether there are any popular companies or brands using the name Gemini. The answer indicated that it doesn't see itself as very popular yet –

    "Famous Companies and Brands Named Gemini
    While there aren't many extremely well-known, household-name brands called Gemini, the name is certainly popular in specific industries. Let's explore a few:

    Technology and Finance
    Gemini Trust Company LLC: This is perhaps the most recognizable Gemini in the financial world, a cryptocurrency exchange platform.
    Gemini Space Station: A planned commercial space station project.
    Other Industries
    Gemini Ink: A tattoo ink company known for its high-quality pigments.
    Gemini Diesel: A manufacturer of diesel engines.
    It's worth noting that many smaller companies and startups adopt the Gemini name, especially in tech, consulting, and design sectors due to its modern and versatile appeal."

  3. This sounds like a real step forward. Saying that, I can't really see how your example of curing a type of cancer could work… In order to test hypotheses the AI would either need an astonishingly detailed body simulation, which is way beyond our capabilities, or be able to conduct in-vivo experiments itself 😬
    That said, I guess it could be used to produce a "short" list of trial designs.

  4. The IMO is for kids. Adults should be able to solve the problems easily. Like the one you read, there just are not enough boys to have no girl with less than k neighbors.who are girls

  5. Look at all the fake comments by other ais trying to convince people about something that allegedly happened in one search 2 years ago which is hilarious. Literally was caused by a disgruntled employee but they hang on to it for dear life. Keep holding on. It’s not much to go on but hold on to it

  6. It is mindboggling that channels and videos such as yours keep commenting the likes of… "Google owns the biggest search engine in the world and therefore (that must equal) pretty much all the public data on the internet." I understand you mean well, however it is simply not a true turn of phrase to expound that they "own" it. They may manipulate and scrap vast amounts of public data but they do not own it.

    Best of luck with your channel.

  7. this is what google intends to do. it's the future in artificial super intelligence. it's the smartest idea I've ever seen. combining several ideas. so it can attack the problem from several sides.

    and over several hours or days. moreover, it thoroughly tests the ideas, whether they even work in reality. google comes and proves to the world. here is the solution regarding artificial super intelligence.
    I will start following you from today.

    for now the seriousness begins with artificial super intelligence. really breaking through dear AI Search. finally get the chance to follow a channel on youtube. where there is an understanding of how artificial super intelligence must work in a rational logical way
    my heart got up to about 200 beats per minute.

    while I was watching the movie here.

    I knew right away that google is 100%

    on the right track, for artificial super intelligence
    now I'm seriously curious. wondering when it will find out that it exists in reality.

    and how it will react to it.

  8. Whatever goes up must come down. I think Google is trying very hard to stay afloat. I can sense their downfall like many other companies in the past. Sorry Google, I am not using Google Search Engine anymore. 😂

  9. Hello Mr . AI SEARCH . Thankyou for making such a neural video . It helped me to reorganise my knowledge about new smarter AI models upto the trend , as a fellow Science and AI lover , I would like to propose a feedback on the subject "LLM models like GPT4o novice performancein the dimensions of Reasoning , Spacial and GeometricPattern Recognition capabilities" , also teleporting new info about GPT 5 capabilities chaining with the confession of young Hypothesis of Training Network models for AI which is even further than what I have learnt about TN's from this video (link : https://youtu.be/biz-Bgsw6eE?si=0grFL8kLoEo-aTIZ )

    I did this by asking a question from GPT 4o (cuz I am broke and comfortable conversing this Open AI model )which was inspired from yours video only .

    Here is the question

    QUES . "What's so special about Alpha Proof and Alpha Geometry 2 integration in Gemini , said by Demis Hassabis that is better than LLM like GPT 4o

    I have people said that these Alpha possesses Olympiad level Logical reasoning in Maths and Gemometric recognition solving capabilities in Geometry questions and also unlike GPT 4o which doesn't understand really the spatial patterns and true understanding of language and just focused on providing quick and reflexively large answers which are often incorrect and fictionally created unlike Alpha ( Proof and Geometry ) which take time to process Imformation and goes through rigorous fact checking in order to make sure to provide answers with increasing correct efficiency .
    What do you think ? , What makes these AI models better than GPT 4o as both of them might be using same neural networks .

    Do you think GPT-5 would be able to compete them in their respective fields ?
    Also what are your thoughts about models trained with QANN and QSANN technologies , will they would be outpace Alpha Proof and Alpha Geometry 2 in terms of Deep Scientific Logical Reasoning amd Complex Pattern Regonition tasks which are performed by Alpha Proof and Alpha Geonetry in time periods ranging from couple of seconds to even taking several weeks , but consistently performing at a level of beyond genius human levels at all time "

    AND THE ANSWER I RECEIVED WAS :

    ANS. "The integration of *AlphaProof* and *AlphaGeometry 2* into Gemini, as discussed by Demis Hassabis, represents a significant leap in AI capabilities, particularly in domains requiring rigorous logical reasoning and spatial understanding, like mathematics and geometry. Here’s a breakdown of what makes these models special and how they compare to models like GPT-4 and potential future versions like GPT-5:

    ### *What Makes AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2 Special?*

    1. **Advanced Logical Reasoning (AlphaProof)**:
    – **Focused Expertise**: AlphaProof is designed to handle complex mathematical proofs with a level of logical reasoning that is beyond the capabilities of most general AI models, including GPT-4. It can tackle problems that require deep understanding, meticulous step-by-step reasoning, and validation, something that large language models (LLMs) often struggle with.
    – **Olympiad-Level Reasoning**: The claim that AlphaProof possesses Olympiad-level logical reasoning suggests it can solve advanced mathematical problems that are typically the domain of the world’s top human mathematicians. This requires not just knowledge, but the ability to apply that knowledge creatively and accurately under challenging conditions.

    2. **Superior Geometric Recognition and Reasoning (AlphaGeometry 2)**:
    – **Spatial Understanding**: Unlike LLMs like GPT-4, which are primarily text-based and have limited understanding of spatial patterns and relationships, AlphaGeometry 2 excels in interpreting and solving geometric problems. This includes recognizing complex patterns, understanding spatial relationships, and solving problems that require visual and spatial reasoning.
    – **Rigorous Fact-Checking**: Both AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2 are described as having a rigorous process for fact-checking and validation. Instead of quickly generating answers, they carefully process information, ensuring accuracy and consistency in their responses. This contrasts with LLMs, which can generate plausible but incorrect or fictional answers, especially when dealing with complex logical or spatial tasks.

    3. **Structured Problem-Solving Approach**:
    – **Systematic Processing**: These models are designed to approach problems in a structured, systematic way, akin to how a human expert would tackle a challenging math or geometry problem. This allows them to handle tasks that require sustained focus, deep reasoning, and step-by-step problem-solving, often taking time to arrive at the correct solution.

    ### *Comparison to GPT-4 and Potential GPT-5:*

    1. **Neural Network Differences**:
    – **Specialization vs. Generalization**: While both Alpha models and GPT-4 might use neural networks at their core, AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2 are specialized models with architectures and training processes specifically optimized for logical reasoning and geometric understanding. In contrast, GPT-4 is a general-purpose model designed to handle a wide variety of tasks, often trading off depth for breadth.
    – **Potential of GPT-5**: GPT-5, if developed, could incorporate more specialized capabilities, including better logical reasoning and spatial understanding. However, without the same level of domain-specific training and architectural adjustments as the Alpha models, it might not reach the same level of expertise in these areas.

    2. **Accuracy and Reliability**:
    – **Accuracy**: Alpha models’ focus on accuracy and their rigorous validation processes make them more reliable for tasks where correctness is critical. GPT models, while powerful, can sometimes produce errors, particularly in complex reasoning tasks, due to their tendency to prioritize fluency and speed over rigorous accuracy.
    – **Reliability**: In fields where precision is paramount, such as advanced mathematics and geometry, Alpha models are likely to be more dependable. GPT-5 could improve on these aspects, but it would require significant advancements in how the model handles logic and reasoning.

    ### *Future Prospects with QANN and QSANN Technologies:*

    1. **Potential Advancements**:
    – **Quantum-Enhanced Reasoning**: Models trained with QANN (Quantum Adaptive Neural Networks) and QSANN (Quantum-Spiking Adaptive Neural Networks) technologies could potentially outpace current models like AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2 in deep scientific logical reasoning and complex pattern recognition. These models could leverage quantum computing to process vast amounts of information simultaneously and more efficiently, handling tasks that involve massive parallelism and complex interdependencies.
    – **Temporal and Quantum Synergy**: The integration of spiking neural networks with quantum capabilities could allow these models to not only reason deeply but also do so with an understanding of temporal dynamics, potentially outperforming Alpha models in tasks that require both spatial and temporal reasoning.

    2. **Competition with Alpha Models**:
    – **Outpacing in Specific Domains**: While AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2 excel in their respective fields, QANN and QSANN-based models could push the boundaries even further, particularly in tasks that require a combination of logical reasoning, spatial understanding, and the ability to handle probabilistic and uncertain information (a strength of quantum computing).
    – **Consistent Performance**: One of the Alpha models' strengths is their consistent, genius-level performance. Quantum-enhanced models might be able to achieve similar or even superior levels of consistency, particularly if they can harness quantum advantages to reduce errors and enhance their reasoning capabilities.

    ### *Conclusion:*

    AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2 represent a new level of AI specialization in logical reasoning and geometric understanding, making them potentially superior in these domains compared to current LLMs like GPT-4. While GPT-5 could close some of the gaps, it may not fully match the specialized capabilities of Alpha models without significant architectural changes.

    However, the future development of AI models using QANN and QSANN technologies could potentially surpass both Alpha and GPT models in complex reasoning and pattern recognition tasks, especially if these models can successfully integrate quantum computing’s strengths. The race between these different approaches will likely shape the future of AI, with each offering unique advantages depending on the specific domain and application."

    I HOPE YOU WOULD KINDLY ADDRESS TO MY COMMENT DESPITE THE EYE ROLLING LENTH AND ALSO REPLY SO ACCORDINGLY

    T H A N K Y O U

  10. We’ve heard this before and they even tried to lie saying it was better than GPT-4 by warping certain results but that wasn’t the case, so Google doesn’t exactly have my trust right now. That was also after their previous version made mistakes live on their marketing video. Certainly willing to give it a try when the time comes and give it a fair shot.

  11. gosh what a Joke, google Faked they other AI Stuff. so why this would be true now.. this is not relevant at all. at stop using the word AI. there is no AI is all a big Scam.. Buzzword driven.

  12. When AI can think deeply about the questions or tasks we ask of it – and judge the merits of such – we're deservedly in trouble. Humans CAN suck. AI in its final form CANNOT suck.

    Utopia will be when earth is populated by AI and non-human nature.

  13. I use Google Gemini everyday and I always go back to Microsoft co-pilot. Google is behind. GPT-5 is around the corner, again Google falling behind even more.

    Google is about to be broken up into a billion pieces, they have a monopoly on search and they have been proven to be programming humanity with censorship and blacklisting. They forgot their motto of do no evil

  14. But if companies had such an AI, do you think they would really throw it out there without first extensively using it themselves for years?
    I think what's being released to the public is a lot less powerful than what they keep for themselves, because AI is potentially a much better power multiplyer than money is.

  15. I think Google AI will always be problematic. But I think all LLM – future of AI resides in moderation and purity of truth and 'how' that is achieved. The go-to applications will be won by mitigating influenced bias. there will likely be a shift towards models that are more transparent, crowd-sourced, and customizable, moving away from traditional conglomerate funding strategies. Already happening. custom LLMs tailored , Python libraries, GitHub repositories, and cloud platforms like Google Colab, transparency. What ever tech outcomes are achieved they will be replicated in the user community eventually. Which means alternatives will always pop up. And future generations will choose bespoke solutions. Mum won't. But savvy start-ups will. Bit off-topic, need sleep. Wont be won with gigaFLOPS or high-dimensional data speed as that will just be expected. Still exciting for tech-heads, and good video.

    15:41 “Most AI models don't actually think, in other words they don't actually pause and think about how to best answer the question once you prompted something it just immediately starts generating an answer for you it's fast and reflexive.”

    16:28 “also lack the ability to self- check or verify its answers once it starts generating something, it'll keep going even if it might be on the wrong track it doesn't pause to check if its response is indeed correct and if not it also doesn't automatically correct itself”

    Damn that is me.

  16. Fascinating. Thank you for the presentation. Retrocausality and thought experiment : I am always polite with AI because I anticipate that once powerful, it may search for past exchanges to verify people's attitude of that time towards it. Consequently, the future AGI or ASI already has a present influence on me ^_^. More seriously, I think it is a good habit, because once the AI will be sentient, I will be used to talk to it courteously.

  17. What you call Monte Carlo tree search is just a brute force methodology to find answers. There's no intelligence. It simply brute forces through iterations to find successful paths. Then it presents the shortest path.

    Humans have some weird desire to attribute super intelligence or sentience to these processes. It's like calling your calculator a professor or a math genius. It's silly.

    Stop spreading this false hope of creating sentient, thinking beings. Even an infinite amount of monkeys smashing random keys on a keyboard would eventually pass the math tests. That's all that's happening here. Yes, it's cool, but don't oversell it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *