Do you want to join my team? Apply here: If you’re serious about AI and want access to my code, click here: Get 50% off Perplexity: Follow me on Twitter – Please subscribe. With Perplexity and VS Code, you can do literally anything. This video will teach you how to create your own Chrome extension from scratch, even if you know nothing about AI or programming.

By admin

30 thoughts on “Build Anything with Perplexity, Here’s How”
  1. Very informative video.

    I’m a bit confused about Perplexity. If you have Perplexity, does that mean ChatGPT and Claude are redundant? Or is Perplexity different in functionality?

    Does Perplexity have projects like Claude does? Because if it doesn’t have projects, then Claude might be better.

    If anyone has any input please reply 😀 Sorry, I’ve never used Perplexity.

  2. Interesting but I can still see your lack of experience. By the way, quite at the end, when brainstorming takes place then you understand how it works and what triggers what. This just mean that you didn’t choose the adequate way to intercept what you intended and obviously another approach seems now compulsory even if you succeed.

  3. Omnibus of Computational Conundrums

    *1. Figma's Synthetically Sapient Siege upon the Bastions of Interface Thaumaturges:*

    * *Figma's Neoteric Noetic Apparatuses:* Figma disgorges synthetically sapient accoutrements, encompassing the parthogenesis of user interfaces from logographic stimuli and the ophthalmological exhumation of pictorial assets within projectiles.

    * *The Portentous Prognostication:* These contrivances menace to automatize the esoteric labors of interface thaumaturges, potentially engendering a cataclysmic paroxysm in the vocational emporium for visual prestidigitators.

    * *Facetious Observation:* The rhetor waxes jocular about his Figma workspace's Gordian entanglement, exhibiting his quotidian vicissitudes as a demiurge of digital realms.

    *2. The Apotheosis of Claude Sonnet 3.5:*

    * *Leviathanic Lexical Paradigm Breakthrough:* Claude Sonnet 3.5 materializes as a formidable adversary to GPT-4, exhibiting preternatural prowess in code genesis.

    * *Salient Attributes of Unparalleled Sophistication:* The enhancement boasts ameliorated algorithmic composition capabilities and introduces "artifacts" for the preservation and assemblage of code fragments of Byzantine complexity.

    * *Agonistic Milieu of Unremitting Ferocity:* The meteoric advancement of Leviathanic Lexical Paradigms such as Claude and GPT underscores the Darwinian struggle for supremacy in the realm of synthetic cognition.

    *3. OpenAI's Retaliatory Gambit: The Genesis of Critic GPT:*

    * *Conflagration Contra Conflagration:* OpenAI unveils Critic GPT, a GPT-4-predicated paradigm engineered to discern and rectify infinitesimal aberrations in GPT-4's generated algorithmic tapestries.

    * *Meta-Cognitive Advancements of Unprecedented Intricacy:* This illuminates the ongoing evolution in artificial sapience, with models being conceived to refine and ameliorate their progenitors in a self-reflexive loop of perpetual enhancement.

    *4. Nvidia's Pyrrhic Triumph & Etched's Quixotic Gambit:*

    * *Nvidia's Ephemeral Hegemony:* The insatiable appetite for synthetic cognition tools momentarily catapults Nvidia to the apogee of global corporate valuation, a fleeting instant of fiscal supremacy.

    * *Etched's Audacious Innovation:* The nascent enterprise Etched introduces a semiconductor of such Byzantine complexity that it physically embeds transformer architecture onto silicon, potentially revolutionizing processing velocity for transformer models to a degree hitherto thought impossible.

    * *The Damoclean Caveat:* Etched's prosperity precariously hinges upon the continued supremacy of transformer models, accentuating the Brobdingnagian peril associated with wagering the entirety of one's fortunes on a singular architectural paradigm in the ever-shifting sands of technological progress.

    *5. The Ubiquitous Permeation of Synthetic Sapience: From Cupertino's Pomaceous Purveyor to Santa Clara's Silicon Sorcerers & Menlo Park's Linguistic Leviathan:*

    * *Artificial Cognition Saturation to the Point of Cognitive Overload:* Notwithstanding the pervasive "synthetic sapience satiety," behemoth corporations persist in the relentless integration of artificial cognition into their wares: Apple's Intelligencia, Microsoft's Cybernetic Co-pilot, and the infusion of synthetic sapience into ARM's infinitesimal silicon cerebra.

    * *Intel's Countervailing Stratagem:* The Santa Clara silicon sorcerers conjure forth the Lunar L chip, a prodigiously energy-frugal x86 processor, its raison d'être being the enablement of artificial cognition capabilities on portable computational devices sans the pernicious effects of thermal hyperexcitation.

    * *Meta's Colossal Linguistic Model Compiler of Unparalleled Sophistication:* Zuckerberg's legion unveils a model trained upon a dataset of such Brobdingnagian proportions as to boggle the mind, capable not merely of compiling code but of potentially engendering entirely novel programming languages heretofore unimagined by human intellect.

    * *Existential Trepidation of Cataclysmic Proportions:* The orator, in a moment of sardonic self-reflection, expresses consternation that the language generation capabilities of these silicon savants might render his own programming acumen as obsolete as a sundial in a digital age.

    *6. The Proscription of Kaspersky's Cybernetic Sentinels & Clandestine Machinations:*

    * *Geopolitical Repercussions of Titanic Magnitude:* Kaspersky's digital aegis finds itself interdicted within the borders of the United States, a consequence of its purported clandestine affiliations with the Kremlin's machinations.

    * *Commercial Practices of Dubious Ethical Standing:* The rhetor, with a wink and a nod, alludes to an acquaintance possessed of the arcane knowledge required to circumvent such interdictions, hinting at the potential for nefarious activities lurking in the penumbra of the cybersecurity realm.

    *7. Cloudflare's Machiavellian Stratagems of Pecuniary Extortion:*

    * *Aggressive Upselling Tactics Bordering on Extortionate:* Cloudflare finds itself besieged by a tempest of opprobrium for allegedly issuing threats of digital annihilation unless their clientele acquiesces to a pecuniary demand of truly rapacious proportions.

    * *Ethical Quandaries of Profound Complexity:* This situation engenders a veritable Pandora's box of inquiries regarding Cloudflare's mercantile practices and their treatment of diminutive clientele, particularly those ensconced within industries of a potentially "precarious" nature, such as the purveyors of aleatory digital diversions.

    *8. Adobe's Machiavellian Content Appropriation & Subscription Tribulations of Kafkaesque Proportions:*

    * *Contentious Terms of Service Bordering on the Draconian:* Adobe ignites a conflagration of outrage with the promulgation of updated terms and conditions that appear to assert ownership rights over user-generated content of such sweeping breadth as to beggar belief.

    * *Parallels to Dystopian Narratives of Unnerving Verisimilitude:* The orator draws an unsettling parallel to a certain episode of the televisual anthology "Black Mirror," highlighting the dystopian implications of corporate entities exerting hegemonic control over the creative output of the digital proletariat.

    * *Antitrust Imbroglio of Labyrinthine Complexity:* Adobe finds itself ensnared in a litigious web spun by the United States government, accused of erecting Sisyphean obstacles in the path of users seeking to extricate themselves from the company's subscription-based stranglehold.

    *9. Apple's Tribulations in the Face of European Union's Regulatory Leviathan:*

    * *Antitrust Pecuniary Penalties of Astronomical Proportions:* The Cupertino colossus faces the specter of a $30 billion fine, a sum so vast as to make Croesus blush, for alleged contraventions of the European Union's Digital Markets Act, exemplifying the increasingly Argus-eyed scrutiny under which tech behemoths find their market dominance placed.

    *10. The Vertiginous Descent of Tech Lead and the Metamorphosis of a Digital Pedagogue:*

    * *The Precipitous Fall from Grace of a Self-Proclaimed Silicon Valley Savant:* The YouTube personality known as "Tech Lead" stands accused of egregiously abusing the platform's copyright system, a transgression of no small import.

    * *A Conundrum of Hermeneutic Complexity: Satire or Genuine Decline?* Our loquacious narrator embarks upon a prolix analysis of Tech Lead's evolution from purveyor of programming pedagogy to fomenter of controversy, engaging in a protracted deliberation as to whether this transformation represents a calculated foray into the realm of satire or a genuine descent into ignominy.

    * *The Machiavellian Machinations of a 5D Influencer Grandmaster:* In a flight of speculative fancy, the orator posits that Tech Lead's controversial persona may in fact be a stratagem of such Byzantine complexity as to constitute a form of multi-dimensional chess in the digital influence sphere.

    *11. GitHub's Melodramatic Imbroglio & The Internecine Strife of JavaScript Acolytes:*

    * *Open Source Conflict of Operatic Proportions:* An open-source contributor on GitHub finds himself the target of opprobrium most vehement for a pull request of seemingly innocuous nature, engendering conspiracy theories of such baroque intricacy as to make the machinations of the Borgias seem straightforward by comparison.

    * *The Tribal Warfare of JavaScript Devotees:* Our narrator, with a touch of sardonic wit, expounds upon the propensity of JavaScript developers to engage in debates of such passionate intensity as to make the Montagues and Capulets seem positively amicable by comparison.

    *12. The State of JS 2023: React's Indomitable Supremacy in the JavaScript Firmament:*

    * *A Cartographic Representation of the Framework Landscape:* The results of the State of JS 2023 survey, a veritable Domesday Book of the JavaScript ecosystem, reveal the continued dominance of React.js, its hegemony seemingly unassailable.

    * *Other Frameworks of Note in this Digital Pantheon:* The orator deigns to mention the burgeoning popularity of Svelte and the growing appreciation for Vue.js, though they remain but pretenders to React's throne.

    * *A Moment of Unabashed Self-Aggrandizement:* Our narrator, in a display of hubris that would make Narcissus blush, celebrates the elevation of Fireship (his own digital fiefdom) to the position of preeminent JavaScript channel, while simultaneously poking fun at the very language that serves as the foundation of his empire.

    *13. YouTube's Crusade Against the Scourge of Advertisement Obfuscation:*

    * The Implementation of Server-Side Advertisement Injection Protocols

    * A Humorous Interlude of Dystopian Proportions

  4. 💯❤Thanks as always for your thorough explanations—you really are the best! I noticed that Perplexity has either changed its operations or introduced a new feature that makes it resemble a multi-agent model. Could you explore this change in an upcoming video?

  5. i had the great idea of using llm to help me write a google chrome extension, and for some reason I cannot get the format of my JSON file correct. followed every checklist i can find to troubleshoot the issue and it tells me exactly what line the error is on – but I still can't get it right. Frustrating!

  6. Well guess what all other llm are garbage i tried all of theme
    I am a developper and the only one that actuallly helps is gpt models
    Gemini without even saying its like comparing ronaldo & maquire 😅
    Gemini is waste of money its so lazy cant debuge a thing so protective overall garbage
    The claude model not really bad compared to gpt 3 but slower
    Llama the fastest but not really smart
    At the end if ur a dev go with gpt 3 its free its amazing its all u need now they even offer 4o wich is a huge boost cuz it can read files

  7. Haven't tried or heard perplexity before, still sticking with ChatGPT. OpenAI is still the leading AI and that's means they'll still get the most funding and eye from the public. I tried Gemini (Google) and it still doesn't compare to ChatGPT. Gemini doesn't really remember what I asked before, and that's pretty annoying. It also doesn't has the ability to browse the web which is the main reason I use ChatGPT because with that feature, I could ask("force") ChatGPT to use a page or site as reference in case it doesn't understand what i mean. In the end, the other AI will still be behind ChatGPT for the near future although Microsoft's Mistral and Google's Gemini might be able to catch up just because the amount of funding they will get down the line.

  8. The best way to test both of them is with your own content which I did. I tested both of them surrounding my own created articles. I learned that GPT 4o did a better job than Perplexicity. As for coding, I have not fully tested perplexicity but gpt 4o helped me creating awesome modules for my WordPress website. In addition, i asked perplexicity to translate something into Japanese and it crashed 🤣 looping his answers over and over and it was not stopping by itself lol. In addition, GPT 4o has a good memory and perplexicity not, which is extremely important for coding and that explains the dynamic in the output in this video and you had to correct it and adjust the code multiple times. I heard people complaint that gpt4 on perplexicity is less better than the original one. In terms of search, yes, Perplexicity is the winner because it offers more (yet it failed with my own content,) but I use bing with its build in gpt.

  9. Been watching a bunch of Your videos and they're great 🎉👌 Your giving us awesome content!

    At the same time as somebody new to AI and LLM's I'm confused on what to subscribe to – GPT 4.0, Claude 3 or Perplexity…?! 🤔

    Which would You suggest?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *