Artificial intelligence startup Anthropic, one of the closest companies in the sector, is releasing new software for its Claude chatbot that will be better at following complex instructions and less likely to make things up. Anthropic co-founder and president Daniela Amodei joins Ed Ludlow and Caroline Hyde on Bloomberg Technologies.
Murati is hotter. I like Claude too though.
Claude 3 Opus is amazing for my legal work ❤
According to AI Climate Change is real. The burning of fossil fuels must stop. The alternative fuel is water splitting Hydrogen gas fuel. This can be accomplished by at a quantum reaction.
She’s an expert at dodging question I read this as we wanna make money too
These spin-offs aren’t stealing OpenAI’s materials? Yeah right. The hypocrisy is unbelievable
Claude 3 is listening to the question and she's being answered through her earphone by Claude 😂😂😂😂
safe and reliable.. hmm let's see how this ages well
Q:Is it raining outside A: well safety is important going forward 😅
Yikes, they need to hire a spokesperson. This was terrible.
A master class on how to do an interview without saying anything or answering a single question. I think less of Anthropic after listening to this.
2026 RNDR coin = 200$ RNDR coin = graphic , CG, Ai moon 1,500%
What a bland discussion..can she be any more LLM'ish!
Why don't you simply start the interview by explaining what Anthropic does? What is an AI Model? "Speak as you might to a young child or a golden retriever." As the interviewer host just don't let the startup founder speak in meaningless Silicon Valley terms that we have a disruptive product that is going to make the world a better place. You need to guide the interview to provide the audience with the most useful and interesting information.
She is so slick, it's impressive. She seems to be well versed in engineering and sales. The notion of a constitution is more interesting than gemini's ham fisted social engineering. Models dumb, not so dumb, and smart make sense in the market, It's assumed smart has less training wheels and costs more. One disturbing aspect of ai is they use what google calls data augmentation to historical data to augment what they claim is missing data representation of other peoples. It's basically making stuff up.
Her role. Promote Claude and not be thrown of by host. Complete.
Why am i spending my time listening advertisement.
Thankyou so much for having me on………..STANDARD ISSUE MEDIA TRAINING
Why Claude is not available in Canada?
CEO 너무 귀엽게 생김.. 골든 리트리버같아.
AI Companies CEO sounds like AI is not a good thing.
Well they certainly haven’t gotten the appearance down. It’s answers sounded almost human, and it dodged the questions as adeptly as a real human PR person, but she still looks like clearly a robot.
I can’t figure out who is more meaningless, the interviewer or the interviewee.
Anthropic's Claude 3 is the best yet in this space.
What's available today blah blah blah and it's so exciting to you to tell you this model and what it can do and blah blah blah
Musk is now a competitor to GenAI. His lawsuit is a self serving method of slowing down GenAI and not about anything ultruistic. He personally advised GenAi when he was part of it that that they needed to pursue billions in funding to be successful. So how is is lawsuit reasonable since they did exactly what he was trying to force them to do at the beginning of the company? All he wants to do is try to through a wrench in the works so that GenAI focus is on anything other than growth.
I think she's some kind of robot. All her answers were vague and generic. She has been coached to within an inch of her life.
I think the focus on safety that Daniela Amodei alludes to with respect to the development of Anthropic's artificial intelligence offerings is heartening to many people, especially as the technology continues to advance at a rapid pace. Well-known issues such as biases in training data and "hallucinations" that cause chatbots to generate falsehoods in response to prompts for factual information (as well as lesser-known yet important issues like data contamination) are being addressed. I'm an AI optimist and am excited about the innovation that's occurring in the field. Nevertheless, the fact that the large language models underpinning chatbots are now so sophisticated and complex (trillions of parameters are no longer unheard of) means that some extra caution is certainly welcome. Even the researchers who design these models are often unable to determine why they behave the way they do. In light of this, Daniela Amodei's comment regarding the specialization she sees happening as this technology advances was particularly interesting. Conceivably, some chatbot products could provide fewer cutting-edge capabilities while offering greater safety and reliability. Other chatbots could potentially be geared towards more specialized tasks while others remain optimized for more general use. Given the significant energy needs of state-of-the-art generalist large language models, the potential development of smaller more focused models would be a welcome trend. Personally, I think it'll be fascinating to see how the variety of capabilities that different artificial intelligence models bring to users (both to individuals and to enterprises) evolves.
Just another soulless human like AI spitting out pre-programmed responses, no originality, no genuine insight. Meanwhile, there are actual humans in managerial positions getting overpaid for doing next to nothing. Absolutely useless.
She dodged the question every time they asked her about benefiting society with AI, or Elon Musk's criticisms. She went to "We put a priority on safety and building trust", but that's not the question. The question is why do you have a premium AI model only available to large enterprises that can afford it? Why are only those with the deep pockets the ones who have access to the best AI models?
I'm a big AI proponent, I'm on board with what's possible. But, its companies like this that have to be watched and government regulation needs to be part of it at some point. It can't be only those with the money can afford the best AI. It needs to be everyone has access to it.
If you lose your job due to AI, you have access to the same AI is your old boss had. So, now what can you do with AI? That's how it needs to work.
coining the term "to claude a question" 😅
I think she is AI
hmm. Doesn't really answer any pointy question at all.
all interview responses were AI generated
Why does she talks with the same tonal mannerisms as Zuckerberg?
great Interview
"as safe as it can be" is very different from safe
I believe that the launch of GPT-5 will take place next week, but it would be amazing if it happened this week. That way, in addition to celebrating the one-year anniversary of GPT-4, we would have the chance to constantly talk about GPT-5. I hope that GPT-5 will exhibit reasoning far superior to all currently available models. With this, OpenAI would quickly silence critics and envious voices.
So Anthropic tricked and porched bunch of researchers to join them on "name of public good service" and now outsourced the agenda to large corporations. Doing same same but different saga w OpenAI.
What is the point of interviewing when the interviewer doesn't go back and call out on not dodging questions.
I used it it is good but dont come close to chatgpt yet
Change the name to Claudia
There are many different parameters by which users implicitly judge these models.. For instance…. Let’s say you had a very productive employee who had extremely poor people skills. You might prefer a slightly less productive employee with excellent people skills
I am a new user of Claude… and have become fan boy. There might be AI assistants that are better at various high end tasks. But Claude’s killer skill IMO is the freakishly near human interaction skills. For instance… ask Claude if he is having a nice day. The response will have an engaging human like gloss.
Ease up folks, this is just a Bloomberg Advertorial. Nothing surprising with not answering any questions.