The new Siri vs. RabbitR1 and Humane pin Rabbit R1: Humane AI pin: MKBHD Merch: Tech I’m currently using: Intro Track: MKBHD’s Logic Playlist Intro music: ~
Code The Future
The new Siri vs. RabbitR1 and Humane pin Rabbit R1: Humane AI pin: MKBHD Merch: Tech I’m currently using: Intro Track: MKBHD’s Logic Playlist Intro music: ~
Those smaller "Apple Intelligence" models are exponentially easier to train that GPT4.
It’s crazy how camera’s have become a “feature” of phones for most
Seems as though clubhouse should have licensed its idea and sold to larger companies
I wish Apple would lean into developing the best speech to text App or feature with Apple intelligence! For this alone, I would buy the latest and greatest iPhone.
AI or just language prediction model?
That's the whole issue with OpenAI and already established AI startups and likely why Sam Altman wanted to push regulations to push out any competition with higher barriers of entry. All the existing smaller AI companies will be absorbed into the established giants. So, Google, Microsoft, and Apple, now Nividia will continue running the entire tech space until we actually do something about oligarchies.
What sound me interesting is that
It could be both a feature and a product
Flashlights: product or feature?
When you gonna respond to Louis Rossman?
Remember when "there's an app for that" now it's "there's an AI for that"
Some pretty good points are made here but I think one important thing this video ignores is that AI software for very narrow use cases can actually exist on its own as a "product" and not become a "feature" — in fact this has been the case for years in things like medicine and scientific research
Is the on-screen awareness an option or a permanent feature?
Definitely a "feature" – always has been, always will be.
There's just no way we will carry more than one/two devices that need constant charging (notebook/phone/tablet + hearing device).
The other distinction in AI that I'd like people to make is between consumer AI and enterprise AI. The hype tends to conflate these two when in reality, there's a huge gulf between them, in terms of implementation and application.
Looking at the enterprise side, how will ordinary companies implement – not use, I think we know enough about the use cases – but actually implement AI?
Will they all train their own Foundation Model? I doubt it, considering the costs. What I call AI-IaaS.
Will they choose Foundation Model-as-a-Service (FMaaS)? In some cases, yes. A kind of AI-PaaS.
But I'm betting the majority will realise (after spending millions in failed POC/Pilots) that they're NOT in the AI business – they just want to consume it, so they will opt for an AI-SaaS solution.
No one is talking (much) about this and there isn't even a broad consensus.
Been watching this dude sense he was a young boul it’s crazy how much he has grown into this man now I’m very proud of him
Counter-Strike the Product (video game) vs Counter-Strike the Feature (mod on Half Life)
Love how a short and quick insight about a certain thought related to technology, you still make a video about it with the proper intro, editing etc, raising the value of your expertise in the industry. Even I enjoy watching this as it brought me closer to subscribing you as a human, rather than just a reviewer. Feels good to watch video from tech channel but is not limited to doing reviews about a certain tech product. Keep it up!
Here’s a question, why can’t ai be both. Sometimes being better as a feature and other times a product?
Feature can be product.
No one asked for ai. No one wants ai. Use your influence to speak out against it, it’s already stolen your labor.
Chatgpt is the product. Everyone elses AI is the feature.