As the research landscape evolves, AI research tools are becoming indispensable for modern scientists and researchers. This video is a veritable treasure trove for anyone looking to use new AI tools to explore and streamline their workflow. ▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving free tools and academic advice directly from me: ▶ Become a master academic writer with AI using my course: ▶ Use my Ultimate PhD Kickstart: 12-Point System for success for aspiring PhD students to get your PhD off to a strong start: ▶ My best YouTube advice curated into an easy-to-follow course, Effortless Academia: ▶ Applying for a PhD? Get my FREE Application Resource Pack to apply with confidence:…

By admin

47 thoughts on “4 NEW AI Tools Transforming Scientific Research You’ve Missed”
  1. It's kinda scary the degree to which scientific researchers are becoming increasingly reliant on LLMs, just as in computer science it can help you but it can produce horrifying side-effects, keep your skills sharp without it and don't allow students to use it. Or they will not know things on their own without it, trust me.

  2. One of the basic ingredients of scientific training is to acquire the skill of reading scientific literature and filtering out what is important and interesting. By all your suggestions you are killing this important skill, if we start using those AI-based sites the result will be catastrophic for scientific research and discovery.

  3. I tried lumina chat to assist me to write a simple seminar paper as an undergrad and I can testify that it is absoulte hot stinky garbage. It is utterly usless for the simpliest questions. It provides papers that add no value and even flags them itself as irrelevant. It takes longer to get anything useful out of this AI than I need to find it myself, because it didn't get me any useful information so far. See, I know that you want to generate money, but get some dignity and apply some quality standards.

  4. Comical interjections looks funny but only from your point of view but not from mine. Look from the other side (viewer's). These actually make videos less effective. Please maintain the original quality that you did (int. guess), take a re-look back at your vid of 2 yrs back.

  5. Thanks Dr. ……Many new AI tools I have tried are difficult to use like SCIPUB. I use the AI for history research. I check all results..AI still gives incorrect answers …be careful

  6. Enough of all these tools. They are all rubbish. They are rubbish if they cannot beat turnitin 😊

    No matter how good they are! Don't use them to write stuff! Turnitin is watching and laughing 😊

  7. Fascinating to see AI tools like Size Summary and eBrain shaping the future of scientific research. Their approach to data analysis could be a game-changer for our industry.

  8. Honestly, cannot see any advantage of these AI tools in research. So far it has only ruined the analytical and thinking skills among students who have become robots who repeat whatever is paraphrased or summarized by AI without even understanding what they say.
    It can be useful for experiened researchers but for undergraduate studends, it has a degrading effect mostly. Without reading, analyzing, paraphrasing, thinking, searching and much more they cognitively digress, hence the quality of papers dramatically worsenes as well. Research will lose if cognitively underdeveloped generation undertakes it in future.

  9. Are you >>sure<< those buttons are "unnecessarily large"? Humbly offering you the opportunity to remember different people see with varying levels of ease and the fast moving tech mean that disability Assistive Technology have new/sudden difficulties that emerge daily.

    The buttons are big. OK cool. Did it stop you from using the the page correctly? Or did you not enjoy it aesthetically?

  10. Hi Andy, I had a question about data extraction and screening for a systematic review. I tried using ai apps like scite and elicit to do paper screening and data extraction. I see where they could be used, but it takes a long time to load and misses or gets a info wrong. Would it best or a bulletproof method to first convert the papers into plain text/.doc, and then copy and paste the plain text articles into gpt4 to critically appraise the papers that i am using for my systematic review individually?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *